<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>letstalkcars.com</title>
	<link>http://letstalkcars.com/main</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>2008 Mercury Sable</title>
		<link>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/mercury/2008-mercury-sable</link>
		<comments>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/mercury/2008-mercury-sable#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Mercury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/mercury/2008-mercury-sable</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Genuine safety and enhanced performance makes a difference
by Jim Meachen and Ted Biederman
Some people say the Mercury brand is hanging by a thread. There’s even talk that parent Ford Motor Company will pull the plug in the near future. Well maybe. None of us really knows for sure.
We agree the product lineup is thin and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Genuine safety and enhanced performance makes a difference</strong></p>
<p>by Jim Meachen and Ted Biederman</p>
<p>Some people say the Mercury brand is hanging by a thread. There’s even talk that parent Ford Motor Company will pull the plug in the near future. Well maybe. None of us really knows for sure.</p>
<p>We agree the product lineup is thin and sales have been in decline, but we discovered over five days and nearly 3,000 miles that there’s still life in Mercury. And it’s pretty healthy.</p>
<p>Mercury has some good stuff to offer customers including the 2008 Sable that we lived with in cold and snowy Detroit and through the wintry West Virginia mountains just prior to the welcome spring thaw of the last month. Other noteworthy vehicles in the Mercury stable include the mid-sized Milan sedan, the Mariner crossover utility and the mid-sized Mountaineer sport utility.</p>
<p>Granted, everything Mercury has in inventory is directly related to a similar product with a Ford nameplate attached. But there’s enough differentiation to give Mercury its own personality.</p>
<p>The Sable is a case in point.</p>
<p>You may recognize the new full-sized sedan as the Montego, which entered the market in 2005. The Montego was part of the 2008 name change game that turned the Ford Five Hundred back into the Taurus and the Montego into the Sable. The original Taurus/Sable mid-sized sedan duo took Ford into black ink in the late ’80s and early ’90s before being shoved into the rental fleet market and eventually into oblivion by 2006.</p>
<p>Ford felt that the retired names had more relevance with the auto-buying public than Five Hundred and Montego. Plus they saved a billion bucks in marketing costs by not continuing to force the issue.</p>
<p>So we have basically the same cars, but with a very important upgrades including the addition of a much bigger engine. The 2008 models have also received a few styling tweaks inside and out –all to the better.</p>
<p>It was obvious to the fraternity of automotive writers even before the Five Hundred and Montego were introduced to the public in 2004 that the V-6 engine assigned to the cars was too weak to adequately move the big sedans. The 3.0-liter engine made only 203 horsepower, which, Ford officials said at the time of introduction was adequate. And actually several owners we talked to in the intervening years also found it sufficient. But it made the vehicles non-competitive.</p>
<p>Here’s the thing we saw back in 2004. The Five Hundred and Montego were well thought out in almost every other way, but were competing with V-6 editions of the popular Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Toyota Avalon and Nissan Maxima that were motivated by 50 or more horses than the Ford products.</p>
<p>The bottom line — Ford developed a really innovative big sedan, but with insufficient power and a questionable transmission choice; not to mention slightly awkward proportioning and sitting a bit too high off the ground. Almost “Audi-like” but not quite.</p>
<p>Ford has corrected the initial misstep by outfitting the 2008 versions of the two sedans with a 3.5-liter 260-horsepower V-6 mated to a six-speed automatic that generates surprisingly good gas mileage on the open road. Both produce excellent performance.</p>
<p>This pushes the Taurus and Sable advantages — considerably more trunk space and a bigger rear-seat passenger compartment — over the Accord, Camry and Altima into the forefront because the Ford siblings now compete on a level playing field in performance.</p>
<p>We successfully loaded four adults and their gear — probably more gear than most families of four will ever haul — into the Sable and comfortably headed from Charleston, W.Va., to Detroit. What were we thinking? Don’t ask!</p>
<p>The 21-cubic foot trunk was packed to the lid, but it held our stuff. And there was no danger that the trunk hinges, which are of piston design outside the trunk opening, would smash something as in some competing sedans.</p>
<p>With the Camry (15 cubic feet), Accord (14 cubic feet) and Altima (15.3 cubic feet) we would have had to start over, move to another car or SUV to accommodate our crew.</p>
<p>Rear-seat legroom of 41 inches translates into stretch-out room in back. It’s comfortable room. We know because we spent 250 miles in the back seat. Only the bigger and generally more expensive Chrysler 300 and Toyota Avalon come with comparable rear passenger space.</p>
<p>The miles eased away in the quiet solitude of an interior well insulated from wind and road noise. When we were in the mood to listen to Sirius satellite radio, it sounded just right on the standard “audiophile” sound system on the Premier trim level.</p>
<p>Plugging in our i-Pod was easy and matching our Bluetooth enabled phone to the car was equally seamless allowing us the hands-free capability to make calls and change the music by using the outstanding voice activated Sync system pioneered by Ford and Microsoft.</p>
<p>The interior, trimmed out in a dark wood against a black dash and black leather upholstery, offered a luxury feel.</p>
<p>The dashboard area is attractive and well laid out. Materials are above average and the seams neatly fit. There’s nothing as grating on the nerves as to live in a car for 3,000 miles with sloppy fit and finish. That didn’t happen in the Sable.</p>
<p>Another noteworthy achievement of smart-thinking Ford engineers is the commanding view of the road. This was accomplished with seats positioned to raise the H-point (the position of the driver’s hip joint) and through the use of a big area of glass.</p>
<p>The higher seating position also allows for easier entry and exit.</p>
<p>So what does the new engine do for the Sable?</p>
<p>A drive on mountain roads is a good test. We took a 2005 version of the Five Hundred with the smaller V-6 on the same route a few years ago. Driving the 203-HP engine required considerable throttle on the upgrades to keep a constant speed and resulted in more engine racket than acceptable in an upscale sedan.</p>
<p>This time around we found that the extra 57 horses gave the Sable a quiet confident boost on the upgrades. It was a pleasing experience.</p>
<p>Our Sable was front-wheel drive and it handled a five-inch snowfall south of Detroit and some wet and slushy interstate roads with no drama. But if you have to live in those northern climates with the prospect of encountering some challenging road surfaces, the Sable comes with all-wheel drive for $1,850 extra.</p>
<p>The Sable’s gas mileage has actually improved with the new engine in-spite of the dramatic increase in horsepower. The old 3.0-liter engine measured by the more stringent 2008 EPA standards rated at 17 mpg city and 23 mpg highway with front-wheel drive. The new engine according to the EPA is expected to get 18 city and 28 highway.</p>
<p>And we were pleasantly surprised when we hit the 28 mpg number coming through the mountains. The Sable mileage compares favorably with the V-6 engines in Accord (19/29), Camry (19/28) and Altima (19/26) despite the fact the Sable is a larger vehicle.</p>
<p>The Mercury comes in only two trim levels — base and Premier — starting at $24,290. Our Premier carried a base price of $28,080 including destination charge.</p>
<p>The sedan comes with considerable standard equipment including such safety features as antilock brakes, traction control, front-seat side airbags and full-length side curtain airbags. Our car also had the optional stability control, power-adjustable pedals and a rear parking sensor. Because of all the safety equipment Sable earns a five-star (front and side) NHTSA rating and the “Top Safety Pick” from IIHS.</p>
<p>The test vehicle was outfitted with the aforementioned optional safety as well as navigation for a bottom line of $32,350 including destination charges.</p>
<p>You may wonder why we have compared the Sable to the most popular midsized sedans because the Mercury is obviously larger. But its price point, standard features, gas mileage and performance match the V-6 editions of the Japanese best-sellers. So, with all other things being equal, why not opt for more passenger and cargo space?</p>
<p>We don’t think Mercury, even with its declining sales numbers, will go the way of Oldsmobile any time soon because of solid, competitive products like the Sable. Living with the Mercury for five days and 3,000 miles was indeed a pleasant experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/mercury/2008-mercury-sable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 Jaguar XKR</title>
		<link>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/jaguar/2008-jaguar-xkr</link>
		<comments>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/jaguar/2008-jaguar-xkr#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Jaguar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/jaguar/2008-jaguar-xkr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This new cat will make you purrrrrr&#8230;
By David Schmidt
One nice thing about a Jaguar XKR coupe is that nobody doubts this is an extraordinary car. Its class and beauty is right up front where no one can miss it. That beauty is also evident from behind, from the side, and probably from above, if you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This new cat will make you purrrrrr&#8230;</p>
<p>By David Schmidt</p>
<p>One nice thing about a Jaguar XKR coupe is that nobody doubts this is an extraordinary car. Its class and beauty is right up front where no one can miss it. That beauty is also evident from behind, from the side, and probably from above, if you cared to hover over it.</p>
<p>The Jaguar XKR is also well powered. There&#8217;s no compromise here. It costs $86,700, and for that amount of money, choosing it over its competitors should only be a matter of taste.</p>
<p>This car also sounds powerful. I guess if you name a car after a large feline predator, it better sound aggressive. The noise and power comes from Jaguar&#8217;s 4.2-liter, 32-valve, 4-cam aluminum V8.</p>
<p>But what makes the XKR earn its position at the top of Jaguar&#8217;s performance standard is an Eaton supercharger. This gets the horsepower up to 420, which Jaguar says will allow the car to accelerate from 0-60 mph in 4.9 seconds. The powertrain uses a modern 6-speed ZF sequential-shift transmission.</p>
<p>Paddles on the steering wheel allow you to play with the gearbox. And it&#8217;s fun to do so, changing this coupe&#8217;s nature from a looker to a doer. Although many performance-oriented drivers consider Jaguar to be a lovely and luxurious cruiser, the level of performance is impressive. You can throw it around and hammer it, having as much fun as you dare, and the Jaguar feels ready for more.</p>
<p>One reason for this: the very good aluminum suspension system is tightened up for better handling. Compared to the standard XK, the XKR&#8217;s front spring rate is increased by 38% and the rear by 24%. While this makes the ride somewhat stiffer, it doesn&#8217;t result in harshness. Technology in the tires and suspension pieces have made it possible for high-end suspension systems to get closer to being all things to all people.</p>
<p>The car&#8217;s lesser weight—just over 3600 lbs—is due to a completely aluminum alloy body shell. It&#8217;s rivet-bonded, rather than welded, which means increased stiffness, less weight, and therefore, more handling capability.</p>
<p>Electronics evaluate what&#8217;s going on relative to the road and where you&#8217;re pointing the car, adjusting for good balance of ride and control.  This means you&#8217;re functioning as a better driver than you would be without it, no matter what level of driver you are.  It lets you go faster, should you be on a racetrack, and otherwise helps you drive more safely.</p>
<p>Compared to the XK, larger ventilated brake discs at the front ensure higher braking performance for the XKR.  The front brake disc diameter has increased from 12.8 to 14 inches, and the thickness from 1.2 to 1.3 inches.</p>
<p>This means the large, 4-wheel ventilated disk brakes are as good at slowing you down as the powertrain is at speeding you up.  They showed no diminishing of ability no matter how hard I pushed, even on a closed track.  Associated electronics helped with driving and stopping.</p>
<p>The exterior design is beautiful.  The XKR gets a shark-fin addition to the side, which doesn&#8217;t add anything to me, but which does point out that you&#8217;ve spent more money for the performance model.</p>
<p>Get inside and you know you&#8217;re literally in the lap of luxury.  Seats are beautifully covered in leather and you&#8217;re cosseted with only the finest of materials wherever you look or touch.</p>
<p>I like the classic instrument panel.  It&#8217;s easy to read, something important to those in the age group that can afford this car.  But being classic doesn&#8217;t mean there aren&#8217;t plenty of things to play with.  There are lots of electronic controls and indicators, as well as a nicely usable navigation system.  One of the reasons I like it so much may be that I&#8217;m big on that surrounded-by-the-cockpit feel.</p>
<p>Everything&#8217;s good looking, and I was pleased with the quality. There&#8217;s little doubt sitting in the car that this is definitely a luxury car.  The ignition can be controlled by a keyless process if you want—you can keep the key in your pocket and use the ain&#8217;t-I-cool push-to-start button on the dashboard.</p>
<p>The stereo is good, as you&#8217;d expect.  You have a choice between high-and even higher audio systems.  The standard 6-speaker will play regular CDs as well as disks full of MP3 digital files, and the single dash-mounted CD slot is actually a 6-disc changer.  The premium system, made by Alpine, has eight speakers, a remote 6-channel amplifier, 520-watt output and Dolby ProLogic II SurroundSound. It adds $1875 to the price.</p>
<p>Both systems produce very good sound.  But that&#8217;s not as easy as it sounds (pardon the pun) in a cabin this small.</p>
<p>The philosophy behind this car is that it should do everything well, and look graceful and charming while doing it. That&#8217;s a hard standard, especially in today&#8217;s crowded luxury car market.  More than that, though, the car must have a distinct personality, one that says its British, by gosh, and a Jaguar.</p>
<p>This car&#8217;s stable, quiet and elegant—just what a Jaguar should be.  But that&#8217;s not all.  Drive this car aggressively and its purr becomes a growl as it leaps to the challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/jaguar/2008-jaguar-xkr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 Mercedes C-Class</title>
		<link>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/mercedes/mercedes-c-class</link>
		<comments>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/mercedes/mercedes-c-class#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jim-meachen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Mercedes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/mercedes/mercedes-c-class</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ They are turning heads and delivering entry level luxury
By: Jim Meachen and Ted Biederman
If and when you purchase automotive entry-level luxury north of $30,000 you would expect your car to have a luxury persona from the way it looks inside and out and from the way it drives and performs. You also have the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> They are turning heads and delivering entry level luxury</p>
<p>By: Jim Meachen and Ted Biederman</p>
<p>If and when you purchase automotive entry-level luxury north of $30,000 you would expect your car to have a luxury persona from the way it looks inside and out and from the way it drives and performs. You also have the right to count on a fair amount of modern automotive goodies and a full-bag of safety equipment for the base price. Options should not be necessary to make your purchase enjoyable and acceptable. Options should be there to pamper the consumer with as many desirable extras as his or her income and desires warrant.</p>
<p>We mention this after a seven-day stint behind the wheel of the completely redesigned 2008 C-Class Mercedes-Benz sedan.</p>
<p>The new C-Class, Mercedes’ most inexpensive product, is not a stop-gap choice until you can afford an E-Class or the flagship S-Class. It stands alone as a complete compact luxury package. No excuses necessary. Although affording an E or S-Class would be nice.</p>
<p>Has Mercedes hit the entry-level luxury nail squarely on the head? A definite maybe!</p>
<p>That’s not always been the case. Like some other companies whose entry-level models in recent years didn’t quite measure up to what can be called traditional luxury such as Jaguar with the X-Class, BMW with the 318ti hatchback and Infiniti with the 4-cylinder G20.</p>
<p>Mercedes entered the modern entry-level class in 1982 with the four-cylinder 190, the predecessor of the C-Class. It carried a Mercedes star, but little else of the Mercedes-Benz persona.</p>
<p>More recently, Mercedes flirted with a hatchback for under 30-grand. The C320 hatch is not a bad car, but again it lacks the Mercedes cache.</p>
<p>For the 2008 model year Mercedes has gotten it mostly right even if you decide to cut all corners and opt for spending just $31,200 purchasing the least expensive C300 without options. You can be assured of actually getting a Mercedes that strives to give traditional Mercedes standards.</p>
<p>That being said, it can be argued (with some trepidation) that the previous generation C-Class — from 2001 through 2007 — was generally worthy of the three-pointed star with the exception of the aforementioned hatchback. But the new model, while retaining the same engine choices as ’07, has been upgraded in nearly every aspect. The exterior styling is more modern and carries many of the flagship’s S-Class flourishes.</p>
<p>The C-Class feels solid, engineered with what appears to be the same qualities and nuisances as the E-Class and S-Class sedans.</p>
<p>Let’s start with the styling, which carries the new Mercedes theme. Perhaps it can best be described as more aggressive looking than the previous edition, more closely aligned with the S-Class. It features a character line that flows downward from the taillight into the front fender, a styling cue that has become popular with automotive designers.<br />
Another difference from the preceding sedan that we found interesting is the clam-shell-like hood treatment that takes the engine bay opening to the edge of the fenders.</p>
<p>And the two trim levels — Sport and Luxury — get a distinct personality due mostly to the grille design. The Luxury edition gets the traditional stand-up hood-mounted three-point star. The Sport features a large grille-mounted star and AMG body cladding.<br />
We like the more aggressive Sport styling, but then we are sure there are those who will opt for a more traditional signature.</p>
<p>Here at the office it has received some enthusiastic praise for its good looks. One young lady even had a picture taken with her standing next to the C-300 for her MySpace page.</p>
<p>The Luxury edition comes with the standard 3.0-liter V-6 generating 228 horsepower. The Sport can be purchased with either the 3.0-liter or a more performance appropriate 3.5-liter 268 horsepower V-6. Both editions get Mercedes’ seven-speed automatic, but for those who want to wring out the most performance, the 3.0-liter can be purchased with a six-speed manual. In reality none of the above configurations gets our heart racing.</p>
<p>So, you ask, isn’t Mercedes slightly behind the curve here? Virtually all entry-level luxury sedans in this price range have 300-horsepower engines available.</p>
<p>True, indeed, and we wondered about that, too. But don’t get us wrong the smaller engine for our testing purposes was really okay and we found it very pleasing and efficient in all aspects of driving. It has been clocked from 0 to 60 in 7 seconds. Turns out it’s one of those cars that actually feels better than the numbers.</p>
<p>Moving up to the C350 Sport (for a base price of $36,500) we were rewarded with 0-to-60 excitement measured at around 6 seconds. More pleasing to be sure!</p>
<p>For those who seek bigger thrills, Mercedes will introduce its AMG version of the new C-Class with a 457-horsepower V-8 this spring. The C63 AMG should handle all challenges including giving BMW’s M3 and Lexus’ coming IS-F a run for the money. But remember the C63 like the M3 and IS-F comes at a much higher price – in this case the $55,000 to $60,000 range according to sources.</p>
<p>Our C300 test car felt very competent off the line at stoplights and reliably quick in merging and passing. It also displayed some nice stick-to-the-road traits in our winding, law-enforcement-deprived back road tests. In other words, the C300 Sport offers a well-balanced performance and handling package. Not as engaging as the C350 nor as quick but good never-the-less.</p>
<p>We like the clean-looking interior designs of both, as much as we like the attractive exterior package.</p>
<p>The optional COMMAND system, once as difficult to operate as BMW’s infamous iDrive, has been simplified for the C-Class. We had no difficult y accessing the audio system and finding and storing our favorite FM and Sirius satellite stations. Likewise, we didn’t have to consult the owner’s manual to try out the hard-drive based navigation system. We commend Mercedes for its efforts in simplifying a once-complicated system.</p>
<p>Earlier we noted that an entry-level luxury sedan should come well equipped without options, but we need to throw a qualification into the mix for the base C300. The base price of $31,200 does not include the seven-speed automatic, so for the vast majority who want their shifting done automatically, add $1,440.</p>
<p>That brings the “true” base price to $32,640. But for that money you get a full compliment of safety features including six airbags, ABS, Electronic Stability Program and tire pressure monitoring. You also get a full range of power equipment, tilt and telescoping steering wheel, an eight-speaker stereo system, eight-way power front seats and dual-zone climate control.</p>
<p>Options are readily available. Our base test car, for example, had more than $9,000 worth of extras including navigation and upgraded stereo system with a 4-gig hard drive, the sports sedan package including sports suspension and 17-inch wheels, automatic transmission and a premium package that includes a multitude of features from Bi-Xenon headlamps to rain-sensing wipers. Bottom line was $41,475. You can load up the C350 the same way.</p>
<p>We like the new C-Class. We think its a viable competitor to the BMW 3-Series, the Lexus ES 350 and IS 250 and the Cadillac CTS. A test drive would not be a waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/mercedes/mercedes-c-class/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FREE &#8220;VIN Check&#8221; for Unrecovered Stolen Vehicles</title>
		<link>http://letstalkcars.com/main/news/free-vin-check-for-unrecovered-stolen-vehicles</link>
		<comments>http://letstalkcars.com/main/news/free-vin-check-for-unrecovered-stolen-vehicles#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltc-news-bureau</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://letstalkcars.com/main/news/free-vin-check-for-unrecovered-stolen-vehicles</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[








For the second time in as many years, the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) is launching another free service to help protect the nation&#8217;s consumers.
Over one million vehicles have been stolen annually in the United States since 1986. With an annual average recovery rate of just 63 percent, several million vehicles remain unaccounted for and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="3"></p>
<table align="center" cellPadding="0" cellSpacing="0">
<tr>
<td align="center"><a href="http://letstalkcars.com/main/gdawg_photos.php?subcategory=153" title="Free VIN Check for Stolen Vehicles"><img src="http://letstalkcars.com/main/wp-content/plugins/gdawg-gallery/images//newsphoto.jpg" alt="Free VIN Check for Stolen Vehicles" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><a href="http://letstalkcars.com/main/gdawg_photos.php?subcategory=153" title="Free VIN Check for Stolen Vehicles"><img src="http://letstalkcars.com/main/wp-content/themes/foundation-10/images/More_Images_Button.png" alt="More Images" title="Click Here for More Images" id="moreImagesButton" /></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>For the second time in as many years, the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) is launching another free service to help protect the nation&#8217;s consumers.</p>
<p>Over one million vehicles have been stolen annually in the United States since 1986. With an annual average recovery rate of just 63 percent, several million vehicles remain unaccounted for and could possibly end up being purchased by unsuspecting consumers.</p>
<p>To help prevent innocent people from buying a stolen vehicle and to help recover stolen vehicles that may enter the commerce stream in the future, NICB today is activating the nation&#8217;s first Unrecovered Stolen Vehicle Database as a free service to the public.</p>
<p>Anyone anywhere can now run a Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) through this database and determine if it has been reported stolen by one of NICB&#8217;s over 1000 member insurance companies.</p>
<p>To check a vehicle simply visit the NICB web site, </font><a href="http://www.nicb.org/t_new"><u><font size="3" color="#0000ff">http://www.nicb.org,</font></u></a><font size="3"> and follow the on-screen directions for the VINCheck search feature which is located on the home page.</font><font size="3">In recent months, NICB Special Agents have identified numerous stolen vehicles that were in the process of being sold by auto dealers or restored by collectors. These examples demonstrate how even car-savvy people can be duped into unknowingly buying a stolen vehicle. If it happens to experts then the risks are even greater for ordinary consumers.</p>
<p>Seeing a way to help mitigate that risk and to provide another free service to help protect the nation&#8217;s drivers, NICB sought and received the cooperation of its member companies to make this feature possible.</p>
<p>It was in this same spirit of cooperation and assistance that NICB&#8217;s member companies provided their Hurricane Katrina-related auto claims information to create the flood vehicle database. This unprecedented effort was launched on October 17, 2005, and amassed over 300,000 vehicle and boat records which gave prospective buyers critical information to prevent the fraudulent sale of potentially flood-damaged vehicles.</p>
<p>The National Insurance Crime Bureau is the nation&#8217;s leading non-profit organization exclusively dedicated to preventing, detecting and defeating insurance fraud and vehicle theft through information analysis, investigations, training and public awareness.</p>
<p>Anyone with information concerning auto theft and insurance fraud can report it anonymously by calling toll-free 1-800-TEL-NICB (1-800-835-6422) or by visiting our web site.</p>
<p></font><font size="2" face="Arial"></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://letstalkcars.com/main/news/free-vin-check-for-unrecovered-stolen-vehicles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 Subaru Tribeca</title>
		<link>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/subaru/2008-subaru-tribeca</link>
		<comments>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/subaru/2008-subaru-tribeca#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 22:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jim-meachen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Subaru]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/subaru/2008-subaru-tribeca</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[








Looking good or better than ever!
By: Jim Meachen
The face that no one could love is gone.The controversial front-end of the Subaru B9 Tribeca has been revised and now looks much like several mainstream vehicles, but perhaps most like a Chrysler Pacifica. It’s merely a ho-hum change, but one that was needed. The previous Tribeca, on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><font size="4"></p>
<table align="center" cellPadding="0" cellSpacing="0">
<tr>
<td align="center"><a rel="attachment wp-att-781" href="http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/subaru/2008-subaru-tribeca/2008-subaru-tribeca-2/" title="2008 Subaru Tribeca"><img src="http://letstalkcars.com/main/wp-content/plugins/gdawg-gallery/images//08-subaru-tribeca-front.JPG" alt="2008 Subaru Tribeca" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><a rel="attachment wp-att-781" href="http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/subaru/2008-subaru-tribeca/2008-subaru-tribeca-2/" title="2008 Subaru Tribeca"><img src="http://letstalkcars.com/main/wp-content/themes/foundation-10/images/More_Images_Button.png" alt="More Images" title="Click Here for More Images" id="moreImagesButton" /></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Looking good or better than ever!</font></strong></p>
<p><strong></strong><em><font size="2">By: Jim Meachen</font></em></p>
<p><font size="3">The face that no one could love is gone.</font><font size="3">The controversial front-end of the Subaru B9 Tribeca has been revised and now looks much like several mainstream vehicles, but perhaps most like a Chrysler Pacifica.</font><font size="3"> </font><font size="3">It’s merely a ho-hum change, but one that was needed. The previous Tribeca, on the market for two years, had an airplane-shaped grille that drew considerable criticism and derision. No doubt it cost Subaru sales. Any change was a good change.</p>
<p>Subaru also altered the rather ungainly name, dropping the &#8220;B9.&#8221; Now, for 2008, the mid-sized crossover is simply called the Tribeca.</p>
<p>Along with the new name and the new face comes an infusion of horsepower.</p>
<p>This is welcome because the Tribeca has been a fine example of a comfortable mid-sized crossover SUV with contemporary exterior styling, a pleasant ride, an upscale interior and a good seating position for the driver.</p>
<p>The 2008 edition comes with a new larger 3.6-liter horizontally opposed boxer engine generating 256 horsepower and 247 pound-feet of torque. It replaces a 3.0-liter engine that made 245 horsepower and 215 pound-feet of torque and had earned the tag of &#8220;sluggish.&#8221;</p>
<p>We delved back into our memory to carve out impressions of the previous Tribeca and the best we could do is remember that the initial offering lacked low-end torque — a bit sluggish off the line — with a tendency to run out of steam under heavy loads when high-speed merging or passing was demanded.</p>
<p>If our memory serves us we rate the new engine a definite improvement in those areas that needed improving. We had no call for criticism this time around, particularly when matching performance against the current Honda Pilot and Toyota Highlander, two models the Tribeca tackles head-on.</p>
<p>A new active valve control system that varies timing on both exhaust and intake together with a revised and recalibrated five-speed transmission that delivers faster shifts and quicker reaction time are responsible for better low-end response, Subaru says.</p>
<p>And regular octane gas is recommended for the new engine. Premium gas was recommended for the previous engine. Subaru said it was able to lower the octane rating through improved cooling efficiency.</p>
<p>Mileage ratings are the same as last year at 16 city, 21 highway. Be advised that 2008 EPA mileage is slightly less than 2007 (18/23) because of the EPA’s revised method of figuring gas mileage.</p>
<p>Other than its controversial nose, the Tribeca features modern styling.</p>
<p>Two years ago the styling was considered more radical than today. It seems that Subaru designers were actually on the cutting edge of new crossover design. Since the Tribeca was launched in 2005, the rounded, sculpted look has caught on in a big way. Examples include the Mazda CX-7 and CX-9, the General Motors trio of GMC Acadia, Saturn Outlook and Buick Enclave and the Hyundai Veracruz.</p>
<p>The interior also has a modern appearance.</p>
<p>We have been intrigued by the dashboard layout, which has a refreshing quirkiness about it. We like the radical swooping design, which curves down into the center console, making a small M shape from door-to-door.</p>
<p>The curving stereo controls and the dual-zone climate controls immediately below are well marked and easy to use. The round climate control knobs toggle temperature and fan speed in precise fashion. The temperature is displayed large in the center of the knob. It’s a neat and effective idea.</p>
<p>The gauges are back lit for excellent daytime viewing. And the multi-colored lights are attractive at night.</p>
<p>The front seats are supportive and comfortable. And in our test car they came with perforated leather for better breathing quality, particularly in hot weather.</p>
<p>The Tribeca comes with an excellent navigation program. The software showed virtually all streets and highways in our area. The street name is prominently displayed along the bottom portion of the screen. Even the off-ramp on a four-lane road was displayed as &#8220;ramp.&#8221;</p>
<p>Although the Tribeca can be purchased with an optional third-row seat, it is useless except for the very young. And when in use, it robs legroom from the second-row passengers. But when the third seat is folded flat, the second-row seats, with a 30-70 split, can be slid back on a track giving passengers large-sedan space. The seats also recline for added long-distance comfort.</p>
<p>Reading lights, cupholders in the pull-down center arm rest and magazine pockets on the front seatbacks offer second-row passengers a comfort zone found in few mid-sized vehicles.</p>
<p>The third-row seat also robs the car of storage space, leaving only eight cubic feet between the seat and the rear hatch. Space expands to a generous 37 cubic feet with the seat stowed.</p>
<p>The Tribeca comes loaded with a lot of good stuff as standard equipment including such safety features as all-wheel drive, traction and stability control, antilock brakes with Electronic Brakeforce Distribution, seat-mounted side airbags and side curtain airbags for rear-seat passengers.</p>
<p>The new Tribeca comes in at the same price points as the previous edition — $29,995 for the base five-passenger version and $31,995 for the seven-passenger. Add navigation and rear entertainment and prices can escalate toward 40 grand. Our seven-passenger test vehicle, without navigation and rear entertainment, came in at $34,500.</p>
<p>We recommend that if you don’t have to carry several children or grandchildren that you save the cash and opt for the five-passenger edition.</p>
<p>The Tribeca has been a solid mid-sized alternative to the likes of the Highlander, Pilot, Ford Taurus X and the Chrysler Pacifica. With the updated engine and front-end styling tweaks it is an even more attractive alternative, if more expensive.</p>
<p></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/subaru/2008-subaru-tribeca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2007 Lincoln MKX</title>
		<link>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/lincoln/2007-lincoln-mkx</link>
		<comments>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/lincoln/2007-lincoln-mkx#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jim-meachen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/lincoln/2007-lincoln-mkx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[








Just what the doctor ordered – for now
By: Jim Meachen
The all-new MKX crossover sport utility is the right vehicle at the right time for Lincoln, and they sure need an infusion of right vehicles.
As predicted the MKX and the new MKZ sedan will have respectable sales in 2007 giving Lincoln a significant increase in year-over-year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><font size="4"></p>
<table align="center" cellPadding="0" cellSpacing="0">
<tr>
<td align="center"><a href="http://letstalkcars.com/main/gdawg_photos.php?subcategory=300" title="2007 Lincoln MKX"><img src="http://letstalkcars.com/main/wp-content/plugins/gdawg-gallery/images//07-lincoln-mkx_front.JPG" alt="2007 Lincoln MKX" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><a href="http://letstalkcars.com/main/gdawg_photos.php?subcategory=300" title="2007 Lincoln MKX"><img src="http://letstalkcars.com/main/wp-content/themes/foundation-10/images/More_Images_Button.png" alt="More Images" title="Click Here for More Images" id="moreImagesButton" /></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Just what the doctor ordered – for now</font></strong></p>
<p><font size="3"></font><em><font size="1">By: Jim Meachen</p>
<p></font></em><font size="3">The all-new MKX crossover sport utility is the right vehicle at the right time for Lincoln, and they sure need an infusion of right vehicles.</p>
<p>As predicted the MKX and the new MKZ sedan will have respectable sales in 2007 giving Lincoln a significant increase in year-over-year numbers. In fact, YTD through July Lincoln is up a significant 12.5-percent in a down market.</p>
<p>Was it a bold prediction? You won&#8217;t think so once you’ve driven the MKX or the MKZ.</p>
<p>Perhaps the biggest initial roadblock for consumers is the new alphabet soup names Lincoln has decided to use mimicking many of the other luxury brands that have gone the &#8220;ABC&#8221; route while forsaking names that used to be household words like DeVille and Riviera and Imperial.</p>
<p>Traditional Lincoln buyers are familiar with such monikers as Town Car, Navigator and Continental, not to mention the Mark series. But Lincoln is looking for new buyers while banking that its loyal over-60 customers continue purchasing Town Cars. And they are.</p>
<p>For those who want to shop Lincoln, how about a couple of pointers before entering the showroom? The MKX is pronounced simply M-K-X, not Mark X or Mark 10. Similarly, the sedan, a car previously known as Zephyr, is properly called the M-K-Z.</p>
<p>But enough of alphabets, today we will comment on the new crossover MKX.</p>
<p>A crossover vehicle is basically a high-riding station wagon, a version of the sport utility vehicle built on a car platform for better ride and fuel economy while retaining bad-weather all-wheel drive capability, but without the off-road prowess of a truck-based SUV.</p>
<p>Give Lexus credit for starting the luxury crossover segment nearly a decade ago with its RX 300. Today there are a myriad of examples, which means the new Lincoln is entering a crowded segment chock full of good vehicles.</p>
<p>We think the MKX has the goods to successfully wade into the competition, but that’s not to say that there’s no room for improvements. The MKX is not a perfect example of the genre, but it’s a good first attempt from Lincoln.</p>
<p>Although the MKX is spun off the all-new mid-sized Ford Edge crossover, we discovered that the MKX has a more upscale personality. It’s more refined than the Edge and is a more desirable product.</p>
<p>That translates into about $6,000 difference in comparably equipped vehicles. We think the MKX is worth the extra bucks, but we’re easy.</p>
<p>Outside, the MKX gets an unmistakably Lincoln grille — a retro Continental look — and unique lamp clusters, and different rear lamps, tailgate and rear fascia treatments. Both the Edge and the MKX have a solid and substantial look with a wide stance, standard 18-inch wheels and a high beltline.</p>
<p>Inside is where the Lincoln definitely shines with a unique and stylish instrument cluster, center stack and door panels. It’s a dual cockpit look reminiscent of Lincolns of the 1960s and early ’70s. And unlike many luxury brands, Lincoln has kept the switchgear user friendly.</p>
<p>The MKX has the feeling of refinement, perhaps because it seems quieter than the Edge, but at the same time it just misses the mark of pure luxury a bit sterile instead of warm.</p>
<p>One of our frequent riders, who had developed a critical eye for things we sometimes miss, was lukewarm to the Edge, but offered up kudos for the MKX. &#8220;This is what I was looking for in the Edge, but it wasn’t there,&#8221; he noted. So maybe today’s MKX is tomorrow’s Edge, and the MKX will move forward towards a more premium vehicle taking on the RX350 head to head. Something we would or should expect from a Lincoln.</p>
<p>At the same time it didn&#8217;t hurt that we had the excellent optional 600-watt THX audio system cranked to the rafters. Our frequent rider is a dyed-in-the-wool audiophile and he was duly impressed with the sound emanating from 14 speakers including two sub-woofers proving the MKX isn’t without some premium luxury items.</p>
<p>The MKX has the same 3.5-liter engine generating 265 horsepower mated to a six-speed transmission as found in the Edge. The new setup gives the crossover vehicles respectable acceleration (0-to-60 has been measured at around 7.6 seconds) and with ample power for passing and merging.</p>
<p>But here is where we think the Ford people could have done a better job differentiating the Lincoln from the Ford. A slight modification of the new V-6 bumping up horsepower a modest 10-to-15 ponies would have really set the MDX apart. To us this would have been a terrific selling point for Lincoln. Furthermore, they could have made all-wheel drive standard on the Lincoln.</p>
<p>What you don&#8217;t get in either the Edge or the MDX is a third-row seat.</p>
<p>It’s amusing to us how many members of the automotive press wring their hands in anguish every time a new SUV or CUV arrives without a third-row seat. It seems they demand an extra seat be crammed into every vehicle regardless of size. We haven’t jumped on that bandwagon. Most of the far-back seats in mid-sized vehicles are uninhabitable by adults and are too close to the rear gate making them hazardous in rear end collisions. If you want more seats check out Lincoln’s Navigator – terrific vehicle and it has all the seats you want. And if you’re patient Ford hints that a larger crossover with a third row is in the works.</p>
<p>Speaking of seats, we found the front buckets comfortable and easily configured to our driving peculiarities. Back support is good. The optional heated and cooled front seats are a nice touch. A short journey nestled in a rear seat left a good impression. They recline, but don’t slide fore or aft as in some vehicles.</p>
<p>Lincoln has included a convenient one-touch remote seat release that folds the seatbacks into a flat load floor. This is a very good feature.</p>
<p>The MKX comes well equipped in just one trim level starting at $34,120 for two-wheel drive and $35,770 for all-wheel drive.</p>
<p>Standard features include leather seating, eight-way power front seats, dual-zone climate control, 18-inch wheels, traction and stability control, antilock brakes, side-impact and side-curtain airbags and tire-pressure monitor.</p>
<p>Lincoln has bundled its most popular options in two packages, the Elite Package for $4,795 and the Ultimate Package for $1,995.</p>
<p>The Elite includes the huge Vista Roof, which pairs a large front power sunroof with a fixed rear skylight for a truly open-air feel; the THX audio system; and voice-activated navigation system. The Ultimate Package adds 10-way power heated and cooled seats, reverse sensing system and the remote second-row seat release.</p>
<p>Most of the bundled items can be purchased as stand-alone options.</p>
<p>Our test vehicle with all-wheel drive and the two bundled options had a sticker of $42,560.</p>
<p>We think Lincoln can and will do better moving MKX further upscale. But for now we think the price is right and we think the MKX will be the right vehicle for many people.</p>
<p></font><font size="2" face="Arial"></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/lincoln/2007-lincoln-mkx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2007 Infiniti M35</title>
		<link>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/infiniti/2007-infiniti-m35</link>
		<comments>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/infiniti/2007-infiniti-m35#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Infiniti]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/infiniti/2007-infiniti-m35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[








Filling an important gap with quality and performance
By: Greg Sanchez
The luxury division of Nissan began life in 1989 as a viable competitor to the burgeoning Lexus and Acura brands.
The Infiniti flagship Q45 was a delightful performance-oriented luxury car pulled by 278 horses, a prodigious number for 1990. It was every bit as alluring and interesting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><font size="4"></p>
<table align="center" cellPadding="0" cellSpacing="0">
<tr>
<td align="center"><a href="http://letstalkcars.com/main/gdawg_photos.php?subcategory=299" title="2007 Infiniti M35"><img src="http://letstalkcars.com/main/wp-content/plugins/gdawg-gallery/images//2007_infiniti_m35_side-shot.JPG" alt="2007 Infiniti M35" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><a href="http://letstalkcars.com/main/gdawg_photos.php?subcategory=299" title="2007 Infiniti M35"><img src="http://letstalkcars.com/main/wp-content/themes/foundation-10/images/More_Images_Button.png" alt="More Images" title="Click Here for More Images" id="moreImagesButton" /></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Filling an important gap with quality and performance</font></strong></p>
<p><font size="3"></font><em><font size="1">By: Greg Sanchez</p>
<p></font></em><font size="3">The luxury division of Nissan began life in 1989 as a viable competitor to the burgeoning Lexus and Acura brands.</p>
<p>The Infiniti flagship Q45 was a delightful performance-oriented luxury car pulled by 278 horses, a prodigious number for 1990. It was every bit as alluring and interesting as the Lexus LS and the Acura Legend. And it was more powerful.</p>
<p>The extraordinarily &#8220;jellybean&#8221; styled J30 entered the lineup in 1993 adding to the luster of the new brand.</p>
<p>But then Infiniti made a wrong turn in the late ’90s.</p>
<p>By 1999 it was left with an uninspiring 140-horsepower G20; a clone of the Nissan Maxima called the I30; and an underwhelming Q45 that didn’t live up to its name having been downgraded to a 4.1-liter engine.</p>
<p>The brand was sliding into mediocrity. But finally and perhaps just in the nick of time, Infiniti made a U-turn back in the right direction. The Q45 was redesigned in 2002 returning to its luxury/muscle days, endowed with a 340-horsepower 4.5-liter V-8.</p>
<p>Yes, the Q45 was again aptly named.</p>
<p>But what really turned the brand around was the rear-wheel drive compact G35 sedan and coupe in 2003. The G35 featured incredible styling, wonderful road manners and a potent V-6 engine. The sedan was endowed with 260 horses and the two-door, a kissing-cousin of the Nissan 350Z, got 280 ponies. The G-series won rave reviews from the press and the motoring public. And an all-new G35 sedan was introduced for 2007. The complete makeover includes a muscular 306-horsepower 3.5-liter V-6.</p>
<p>Then there was the M45. A relatively powerful but somewhat uninspired large sedan slotted between the flagship Q and the sport G.</p>
<p>Infiniti added an all-new up-level mid-sized M-series sedan which replaced the short-lived M45 for 2006, and has continued basically unchanged for ’07.</p>
<p>The M-series is perhaps the best Infiniti in its nearly two-decade history, combining outstanding performance, luxury, handling, spaciousness and good looks in a package that has few rivals. The M35, with a lusty V-6 engine, is a joy to drive. Its more powerful M45 stablemate, which contains a 325-horsepower V-8 under hood, is just as attractive and adventurous.</p>
<p>Infiniti now has in its lineup a competitor to the BMW 3-Series, Audi A-4, Acura TL, Cadillac CTS and Jaguar X-Type in the G35. And the M35/45 has the credentials to take on the BMW 5-Series, Audi A6, Lexus GS350/430, Acura RL and Cadillac STS.</p>
<p>Although the M series shares a platform with the G35, it is nearly six inches longer at 192.6 inches and has a two-inch longer wheelbase at 114.2 inches. This spells more room inside, especially for rear-seat passengers who can enjoy two-and-one-half extra inches of legroom.</p>
<p>The M35 Sport Sedan that we tested displayed impeccable road manners with point-and-shoot steering. We were delighted to find that the sedan has the ability to carve up twisting back-road blacktops like the vaunted BMW.</p>
<p>One of the M’s unique optional features is a form of rear-wheel steering that turns the rear wheels up to one degree opposite of the fronts depending on cornering needs.</p>
<p>The 3.5-liter 275-horsepower V-6 gives the M an urgency that is pleasing at all speeds with the power directed through a slippery 5-speed automatic transmission. When we asked for a downshift by slamming the accelerator to the floor, it responded instantaneously. There was never the agonizing delay found in some other luxury products.</p>
<p>The V-6 will hustle the M35 from a standstill to 60 in 6.3 seconds and through a quarter mile run in 14.7 seconds at nearly 93 miles per hour as measured by a popular automotive magazine.</p>
<p>For more money — about $6,000 — and a slight sacrifice in gas mileage — about two miles per gallon — the M can be purchased with the V-8 good for sub-6-second times.</p>
<p>The M35 is offered in base and Sport and with an all-wheel drive option. Base models are lavishly equipped with genuine, satin-finish Rosewood inlays on the dash, doors, and console, and leather upholstery. The Sport versions get real aluminum trim.</p>
<p>The gauges have a high-tech look with electro-fluorescent lighting.</p>
<p>The M’s controls are fairly intuitive. Included are real knobs for volume and tuning on the radio. You may not think that’s a big deal, but after a week with BMW’s iDrive, simple radio controls deserve a standing ovation.</p>
<p>Although the M does have a joystick control, most of the things you use every time you enter the car including the air conditioning and stereo can be used without wading through a list of options.</p>
<p>The standard-equipment list is long including dual-zone climate control, 10-way power adjustable driver’s seat with memory, color 7-inch LCD information display, keyless entry and push-button starting, a moonroof, a voice-recognition system that manages a half dozen functions, Bluetooth compatibility, and a complete array of power features.</p>
<p>The M also comes with a full compliment of safety features found in sedans over 40 grand including front and rear side curtain airbags. An optional feature is a lane departure warning system that sounds an alarm when the vehicle detects lane drifting. We found it annoying at times, but we can see its usefulness.</p>
<p>Great sound can be part of your M car. The top-line premium package includes a Bose digital Studio Surround audio system with 14 speakers. An in-dash 6-CD player, MP3 player, and satellite radio — both XM and Sirius are offered — are included. A DVD mobile entertainment system with a flip-down 8-inch screen is available for rear-seat passengers.</p>
<p>One of the key factors in a car purchase these days is gas mileage, and the M35 measures up quite well with 18-city and 25-highway for two-wheel drive and 17/24 for all-wheel drive. Infiniti recommends premium fuel, but says the engine will run fine — albeit with a slight decrease in performance — on regular gas.</p>
<p>The M35 starts at $42,100 in base guise, &#8220;base&#8221; being a misnomer because of its lavish list of standard equipment. Our test Sport model carried a base price of $44,900 and was optioned out for $53,440.</p>
<p>Options included the Bose system, navigation with back-up camera and rear seat entertainment.</p>
<p>The M35 is a delightful luxury sports sedan. But Infiniti may have created a dilemma for loyalists with its all-new G35, which is smaller but more powerful and at a nearly $10,000 savings. If you can get by with tighter rear-seat quarters and a slightly smaller trunk, the G may offer you more value than the M.</p>
<p>Either way, Infiniti has its act very much together.</p>
<p></font><font size="2" face="Arial"></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/infiniti/2007-infiniti-m35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 Buick Enclave</title>
		<link>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/buick/2008-buick-enclave</link>
		<comments>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/buick/2008-buick-enclave#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jim-meachen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Buick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/buick/2008-buick-enclave</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[








A CUV worthy of its size
By: Jim Meachen
General Motors saved its best for last.
That was a conclusion easily reached after a few miles behind the wheel of the 2008 Buick Enclave, a full-sized crossover sport utility vehicle.
The Enclave is the third of General Motors’ vehicles off the so-called Lambda platform to reach the showroom. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><font size="4"></p>
<table align="center" cellPadding="0" cellSpacing="0">
<tr>
<td align="center"><a href="http://letstalkcars.com/main/gdawg_photos.php?subcategory=298" title="2008 Buick Enclave"><img src="http://letstalkcars.com/main/wp-content/plugins/gdawg-gallery/images//08-buick-enclave_front.JPG" alt="2008 Buick Enclave" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><a href="http://letstalkcars.com/main/gdawg_photos.php?subcategory=298" title="2008 Buick Enclave"><img src="http://letstalkcars.com/main/wp-content/themes/foundation-10/images/More_Images_Button.png" alt="More Images" title="Click Here for More Images" id="moreImagesButton" /></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>A CUV worthy of its size</font></strong></p>
<p><font size="3"><em><font size="1">By: Jim Meachen</font></em></p>
<p></font><font size="3">General Motors saved its best for last.</p>
<p>That was a conclusion easily reached after a few miles behind the wheel of the 2008 Buick Enclave, a full-sized crossover sport utility vehicle.</p>
<p>The Enclave is the third of General Motors’ vehicles off the so-called Lambda platform to reach the showroom. The Enclave is entering the marketplace about six months after its platform mates, the Saturn Outlook and GMC Acadia, made their initial appearance.</p>
<p>It’s an impressive trio, all featuring a 3.6-liter V-6 engine with 275 horsepower mated to a six-speed automatic transmission. They all offer excellent build quality, outstanding handling traits, decent gas mileage, real-world room for six or seven passengers, all-wheel drive bad-weather capability and upscale interiors.</p>
<p>The Outlook is the least expensive of the three and is designed — according to General Motors — to meet family needs, a replacement for the out-of-favor minivan. The Acadia, which will be sold along side the Enclave in Buick-Pontiac-GMC dealerships, aims more at GMC truck buyers with an upright stance and more &#8220;professional grade&#8221; trim pieces.</p>
<p>That leaves the Enclave to challenge the luxury market with a stylish body that includes a large signature Buick waterfall grille, huge wheels, a wide stance, beautifully designed dashboard, soft leather seating and library-quiet interior.</p>
<p>And for extra measure, it comes with three traditional Buick portholes.</p>
<p>This may be the best Buick in decades.</p>
<p>The surroundings are tastefully plush with upscale materials. Seams are aligned and pieces neatly fit together. The interior is amazingly quiet, offering perhaps the most solitude of any American-made vehicle.</p>
<p>The gauges have aqua backlighting with white markings making them easy to read in sunshine or with sunglasses on. The double-stitched leather in the seats is soft to the touch and inviting.</p>
<p>And there’s more. Our week was filled with comments on the Buick’s styling.</p>
<p>One woman in our neighborhood offered this unsolicited comment: &#8220;I don’t really look at cars, can’t really tell one from another, but that car you’re driving now is the most beautiful I’ve seen in years. I want one.&#8221; That sentiment seems to be holding true in the marketplace as well. Enclave and its sisters are fast becoming real successes.</p>
<p>Whether it’s the big Buick grille or the flow of the lines, including a chrome roof rack that artfully curves with the roof, or simply the whole package we can’t say. But positive remarks on the Enclave styling were so many that we would be remiss in not reporting them.</p>
<p>While so-called crossovers — SUV-like vehicles with unibody platforms — have been in showrooms for years, the new Buick and its stablemates are among the largest to be manufactured so far.</p>
<p>And while we applaud GM’s efforts and specifically the well-done Enclave, it’s still a big vehicle with a big appetite, heavier and thirstier than many of its minivan counterparts.</p>
<p>The front-wheel drive version of the Enclave weighs in at a massive 4,780 pounds and carries a new 2008 EPA fuel rating of 16 mpg city and 24 highway. The all-wheel drive Enclave pushes 5,000 pounds.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the GM trio is a step in the right direction in replacing the old body-on-frame truck-based sport utilities that generally weigh even more and yield even less gas mileage.</p>
<p>We think the Enclave is well powered with the new V-6, certainly no rocket ship, but rather sprightly when compared to other big SUVs and the aforementioned minivans.</p>
<p>While the number most associated with the Enclave is a rather lackluster 8 seconds from 0-to-60, in real-world driving the Buick feels just fine, adequate in all situations including merging and passing.</p>
<p>General Motors has done a good job in the performance/mileage tradeoff.</p>
<p>The Enclave comes in just two trim levels — the CX and the CXL — and in either two-wheel or all-wheel drive starting at $32,055. Our front-wheel drive well-equipped test vehicle carried a base price of $34,990 and with several options a bottom line of $39,080 including $735 destination charge.</p>
<p>If you want to forsake the luxury bent of the Enclave but get basically the same vehicle for less money, the Saturn Outlook begins at $27,255 and the GMC Acadia starts at $29,255.</p>
<p>All feature the same drivetrain and all come with a 4,500-pound tow rating. And all feature scads of interior room for passengers and cargo. The new trio of crossovers beats the full-sized Chevrolet Tahoe in maximum cargo space by eight cubic feet at 116.2. The crossovers offer nearly eight more inches of legroom for third-row passengers. And there is a useable 19 cubic feet of storage behind the third-row seat.</p>
<p>Maybe we’re more snobbish than we care to admit, but we like the Enclave best — and why shouldn’t we since it carries a bigger price tag — because of its head-turning design, its luxury feel and its interior solitude.</p>
<p>The ride may be on the firm side for those used to a Park Avenue or a Lucerne, but it’s still a plush ride, a modern version of the European luxury ride.</p>
<p>Handling is predictable and confidence-inducing. The Enclave is easy to drive, but don’t get carried away on the twisting back roads. Remember, the big Buick is a people mover not a sports sedan.</p>
<p>Standard features abound including 18-inch wheels, full power including power driver’s seat, triple-zone automatic climate control, six-speaker stereo with CD player and MP3 jack and satellite radio, OnStar telematics with turn-by-turn navigation, power tailgate, antilock disc brakes with tire pressure monitoring and three-row side-curtain airbags.</p>
<p>The CXL adds 19-inch wheels, leather seating and heated power front seats with memory.</p>
<p>Options are many including DVD navigation, rear entertainment, upgraded Bose stereo, remote start, 20-inch wheels and a dual sunroof.</p>
<p>The Enclave is not perfect and Buick surely will continue to refine its newest product. But as it sits, the Enclave is the best product to wear a Buick nameplate in many years and it’s a worthy competitor to products from Lexus, Infiniti, Acura and Mercedes.</p>
<p>We hope the Enclave is a reliable predictor of the direction General Motors will take the Buick brand in the future.</p>
<p></font><font size="2" face="Arial"></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/buick/2008-buick-enclave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2007 VW Rabbit</title>
		<link>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/volkwagen/2007-vw-rabbit-2</link>
		<comments>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/volkwagen/2007-vw-rabbit-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jim-meachen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Volkswagen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/volkwagen/2007-vw-rabbit-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[








Back again – hoping again! 
By: Jim Meachen
What goes around comes around!
That old adage has some relevancy because here comes the Volkswagen Rabbit again.
The Rabbit is back, Volkswagen&#8217;s answer to the Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla, Ford Focus and the VW Golf.
Actually, the Rabbit has been roaming the American landscape since it was introduced as the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><font size="4"></p>
<table align="center" cellPadding="0" cellSpacing="0">
<tr>
<td align="center"><a href="http://letstalkcars.com/main/gdawg_photos.php?subcategory=81" title="2007 VW Rabbit"><img src="http://letstalkcars.com/main/wp-content/plugins/gdawg-gallery/images//07-vw-rabbit_front.JPG" alt="2007 VW Rabbit" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><a href="http://letstalkcars.com/main/gdawg_photos.php?subcategory=81" title="2007 VW Rabbit"><img src="http://letstalkcars.com/main/wp-content/themes/foundation-10/images/More_Images_Button.png" alt="More Images" title="Click Here for More Images" id="moreImagesButton" /></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Back again – hoping again! </font></strong></p>
<p><font size="3"></font><em><font size="1">By: Jim Meachen</p>
<p></font></em><font size="3">What goes around comes around!</p>
<p>That old adage has some relevancy because here comes the Volkswagen Rabbit again.</p>
<p>The Rabbit is back, Volkswagen&#8217;s answer to the Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla, Ford Focus and the VW Golf.</p>
<p>Actually, the Rabbit has been roaming the American landscape since it was introduced as the replacement for the old Beetle in 1975. But in 1985 it became the Golf, the name it has carried worldwide since its inception.</p>
<p>Now we’re back to the Rabbit in the U.S. and, frankly, we were puzzled with the name change until we delved into some Rabbit chatter on the Internet. The original Rabbit, which was manufactured in Pennsylvania from 1976 through 1984, was an entertaining little car. But it was poorly made with inferior materials. And by today’s standards it was agonizingly unreliable.</p>
<p>We remember road testing a new Rabbit GTI in 1983, a pocket rocket that offered a delightful driving experience, but rattled so much we had no trouble handing the keys back to the salesman.</p>
<p>The Rabbit seems to be fondly remembered despite its proclivity for mediocrity.</p>
<p>We found a guy on our Web search who wrote that his 1981 Rabbit is a &#8220;great around town car,&#8221; and noted that he would buy another Volkswagen. So what’s the big deal?</p>
<p>He made those statements AFTER citing a laundry list of problems under the heading &#8220;what things have gone wrong with this car.&#8221; The list included &#8220;steering rack replacement, all hoses in engine replaced, alternator replaced, heater core replaced, brakes replaced, ignition switch replaced (twice), muffler replaced, water in headlight compartment, roof leaks, trunk leaks, paint rusted, rear window defroster broken, speedometer cable replaced, horn broken, driver&#8217;s seat recline knob broken and turn signal assembly replaced.&#8221;</p>
<p>Granted, the car is 25 years old, but most cars that age with that much aggravation would now be decorating the far corner of a junkyard.</p>
<p>And there are dozens of missives much like that one.</p>
<p>It has to be Rabbit love. And that gave us an insight into the resurrection of the Rabbit name.</p>
<p>Fortunately, the new Rabbit has little relationship to the old one except for the driving dynamics, which continue to be among the best in the segment. Volkswagen’s build quality, fit and finish, interior materials and reliability are far superior today than in the late ’70s and mid ’80s. The Rabbit has a nostalgic cachet and Volkswagen saw dollar signs in dredging up the name. At least that seems a good theory.</p>
<p>The Rabbit is actually the new fifth-generation Golf with classic Rabbit/Golf squared-off styling that now comes with more rounded lines, an appealing look in a familiar sort of way. The first vehicles, shipped in the spring and summer were tagged 2006 models. In October, they became 2007 models, basically unchanged.</p>
<p>The Golf/Rabbit design has never been one of swooping lines and sexy curves. But the new iteration, which shares a platform and an engine with the more upscale Jetta, is aerodynamic and the design speaks volumes for functionality over styling simply for styling sake.</p>
<p>The prime example is in the rear-seating area where head room is abundant thanks to the squared-off rear. The Rabbit is truly a four-adult-passenger car in both the two-door or four-door models.</p>
<p>The Rabbit has a more classic Volkswagen stance than the new Jetta and is devoid of the over-the-top big-mouth Jetta/Passat grille treatment.</p>
<p>And that’s a good thing. Despite its boxy design, the Rabbit has a crouching look, like it’s ready for action. Some of that look is derived from the color-keyed bumpers and door handles on the four-door model.</p>
<p>One of the more appealing aspects of the Rabbit is its eye-popping list of standard features, starting with the peppy 2.5-liter 5-cylinder engine, for the base price of $15,620 for the two-door hatch and $17,620 for the four-door. And unlike most manufacturers who fill their dealer lots with option-laden vehicles, Volkswagen says that more than a third of all Rabbits will reach dealers in base trim. Base trim on our four-door test car included air conditioning, power one-touch up and down windows, power heated outside mirrors, adjustable wipers, cruise control, AM-FM stereo with six-CD changer and MP3 jack, heated front seats, antilock brakes and a full array of airbags including side curtain.</p>
<p>The most popular option will probably be the six-speed automatic in place of the five-speed manual transmission for $1,075. Our tester also added a power sunroof, Electronic Stabilization Program, 16-inch alloy wheels (15-inch wheels are standard) and XM Satellite radio. That brought the bottom line to $20,920 including destination charge.</p>
<p>The good news is that the new 5-cylinder engine generating 150-horsepower is energetic and fun to drive. The bad news — there’s no optional powerplant for those willing to pay a couple grand extra for more horsepower or for those willing to pay more for a fuel-efficient diesel.</p>
<p>The new engine gives the Rabbit a playful nature. It’s got enough grunt to zip from stoplight to stoplight and it’s tossable on the winding back roads thanks in part to a fully independent suspension system.</p>
<p>Zero to 60 can be achieved in less than nine seconds with the automatic, certainly not pocket rocket territory, but satisfying none-the-less.</p>
<p>Switchgear and gauges are standard Volkswagen. That means most of the controls are intuitive and easy to use. It also means the instrument panel lighting is the typical Volkswagen blue and red, very appealing.</p>
<p>The seats are comfortable, and the front passenger seatback can be folded flat to haul such things as a step ladder.</p>
<p>In addition to decent headroom, rear seat passengers also are rewarded with decent legroom, which is exemplary in a compact design. They also get individual reading lights and cupholders. When not hauling passengers, the interior can be configured for 69 cubic feet of cargo space.</p>
<p>As a bonus Volkswagen has generous warranties — four-year/50,000-mile bumper-to-bumper and five-year/60,000 powertrain.</p>
<p>If you are looking for comfortable, basic transportation at a price that won&#8217;t break the budget and that can accommodate a small family while offering a rewarding driving experience, the new Rabbit might be your animal of choice.</p>
<p></font><font size="2" face="Arial"></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/volkwagen/2007-vw-rabbit-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2007 Lexus RX350</title>
		<link>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/lexus/2007-lexus-rx350</link>
		<comments>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/lexus/2007-lexus-rx350#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jim-meachen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lexus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/lexus/2007-lexus-rx350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[








Lexus Gets another A+ on the RX
By: Jim Meachen

Competition has exploded since Lexus invented the car-based luxury sport utility in 1998 with the breakthrough RX300. 
Eight years ago, the RX300 was the only player in a segment known today as premium crossover. The Lexus set the standard for a slew of vehicles that followed with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><font size="4"></p>
<table align="center" cellPadding="0" cellSpacing="0">
<tr>
<td align="center"><a href="http://letstalkcars.com/main/gdawg_photos.php?subcategory=122" title="2007 Lexus RX350"><img src="http://letstalkcars.com/main/wp-content/plugins/gdawg-gallery/images//07-lexus-rx350_front.JPG" alt="2007 Lexus RX350" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><a href="http://letstalkcars.com/main/gdawg_photos.php?subcategory=122" title="2007 Lexus RX350"><img src="http://letstalkcars.com/main/wp-content/themes/foundation-10/images/More_Images_Button.png" alt="More Images" title="Click Here for More Images" id="moreImagesButton" /></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Lexus Gets another A+ on the RX</font></strong></p>
<p><font size="3"></font><em><font size="1">By: Jim Meachen</p>
<p></font></em><font size="3"><br />
Competition has exploded since Lexus invented the car-based luxury sport utility in 1998 with the breakthrough RX300. <br />
Eight years ago, the RX300 was the only player in a segment known today as premium crossover. The Lexus set the standard for a slew of vehicles that followed with a pleasant ride, a luxurious and Lexus-quiet interior, bad-road capability and a smooth and powerful drivetrain. Darn good if not inspiring.<br />
Nevertheless it was a smashing success propelling Lexus past American luxury standards Cadillac and Lincoln in annual sales. <br />
Even in the last full year of its first iteration in 2002 — the all-new 2004 RX330 reached showrooms in March 2003 — the RX300 sold nearly 73,000 copies, representing 31 percent of all Lexus sales in the United States. <br />
No wonder competing manufacturers were quick to jump on this train before it left the station. Now there seems to be no end to the car-based luxury SUV market. <br />
The current list of mid-sized luxury crossover vehicles reads like a Who’s Who of the upscale industry — Infiniti FX35 and FX45, Mercedes-Benz M-Class, BMW X3 and X5, Acura MDX, Porsche Cayenne, Volvo XC90, Cadillac SRX, Volkswagen Toureag, and all-new for 2007, the Audi Q7. And close to introduction the Lincoln MKX.<br />
It’s a wonder RX sales have held so steady over the years. In 2005, Lexus sold nearly 109,000 copies of the RX, representing about one-third of its North American market. <br />
If you think the competition has caught up with the RX, compare these 2005 sales figures with the Lexus — BMW X5, 37,000; Cadillac SRX, 23,000; Infiniti FX35/45, 27,000; Mercedes M-Class, 35,000; Porsche Cayenne, 13,500. <br />
Now Lexus has updated the RX with a bigger and more powerful engine and in so doing the name becomes the RX350 for the 2007 model year. <br />
We predict the competition, some better, some worse and some that make your heart pitter-patter, will continue to eat Lexus dust. <br />
Even with the current RX body style profile, streamlined with a slant to the rear glass and an arching C-pillar it is well into its fourth year and it’s as sleek and rakishly handsome as anything on the market. We studied a side view of the all-new BMW X5 the other day and darn if it doesn’t bear a striking resemblance to the RX. </p>
<p>Although the RX350 retains the five-speed automatic, it is now mated to a 3.5-liter V-6 generating 270 horsepower, a whopping 47 more than the 2006 model. <br />
The shifter is silky smooth and acceleration is brisk. <br />
The new RX moves nicely from 0 to 60 in 6.8 seconds. Of course, that’s not the way to achieve the very respectable EPA gas mileage rating of 20 city and 25 highway for front-drive models, but it points up the vehicle’s proclivity to move quickly when necessary. <br />
This new-found performance comes at virtually no penalty at the gas pumps. The pervious engine was rated at 20/26. All-wheel drive models are actually more efficient, rated at 19/24 compared to 18/24 in 2006. <br />
For those people who desire this tasty package, but tow small boats or jet skis, the RX is up to the task with a towing capacity of 3,500 pounds.<br />
The all-wheel drive models feature a 50-50 front and rear torque split in normal driving conditions. Nearly all the torque can be shifted front to back as conditions warrant. At the same time, Vehicle Stability Control limits wheelspin side-to-side. <br />
By the way, Vehicle Stability control is standard equipment on front-drive models making the necessity for all-wheel drive in warm-weather climates not as crucial for peace of mind.<br />
Hand Lexus an A-plus for the interior layout. It’s one of the few vehicles with navigation that has gotten it close to right. In many vehicles when you include the Nav system, all the stereo and climate controls are embedded in the screen. This arrangement can be aggravating, not so in the RX. Here the stereo controls are separate and climate controls can be regulated with switches on either side of the center stack. </p>
<p>The dashboard is attractive with big swathes of aluminum accents. The gauges are backlit in usual Lexus fashion which means there is no washout from bright sun and they can be clearly deciphered even with sunglasses on. <br />
The new RX continues with just two rows of seating and we applaud that decision in the face of a growing trend to stuff as many seats into a vehicle as possible. What’s the use of cramming a third unusable seat into a mid-sized vehicle? Furthermore, Lexus has the GX470 for buyers who absolutely demand more seat space. <br />
The RX350 comes in just one trim line with a price difference for front-wheel or all-wheel drive. The front-wheel drive model starts at $38,095 and all-wheel at $39,495. <br />
As you might expect, the base version is well equipped. But a large number of goodies can be added as taste and pocketbook dictate. <br />
Our test vehicle had two rather costly packages, navigation at $2,650 and a premium package at $2,960. The navigation system comes with Bluetooth, voice activation, compass, and backup camera. The premium package includes a myriad of things — leather trimmed interior, power tilt and telescoping steering wheel, moonroof and high intensity discharge headlamps. <br />
We have a problem with Lexus bundling so many things in expensive packages. For instance, we would enjoy the Mark Levinson sound system — there isn’t one better in the automotive world — but it comes bundled in a $6,190 package with the navigation paraphernalia.<br />
A stand alone top-of-the-line audio system option would be welcome if we were making the purchase. <br />
There’s just not much to fault in this vehicle. Emotion in driving is sparse but a week behind the wheel convinced us again that Lexus is unsurpassed in building quality segment-leading products. The new RX350, we predict, won’t have to break a sweat to continuing running far ahead of the pack. </p>
<p></font><font size="2" face="Arial"></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://letstalkcars.com/main/auto-reviews/lexus/2007-lexus-rx350/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
